New Map Shows Community Broadband Networks Are Exploding In U.S.
from the if-you-build-it-they-will-come dept
The Institute For Local Self Reliance (disclosure: I have done writing and research for them) has released an updated interactive map of every community-owned and operated broadband network in the U.S.
All told, there’s now 400 community-owned broadband networks serving more than 700 U.S. towns and cities nationwide, and the pace of growth shows no sign of slowing down.
Some of these networks are directly owned by a municipality. Some are freshly-built cooperatives. Some are extensions of the existing city-owned electrical utility. All of them are an organic, popular, grass-roots community-driven reaction to telecom market failure and expensive, y access.

A breakdown of the new mapping data from the folks at ILSR notes that the number of community broadband networks has been increasing at about a rate of fifteen per year, up from the 8 per year cadence the organization saw between 2001 and 2008. The number of communities served by larger, popular community networks (like Chattanooga’s EPB and Utah’s UTOPIA) continue to grow.
Data routinely notes that community-owned broadband networks provide faster, cheaper, better service than their larger private-sector counterparts. Staffed by locals, they’re also more directly accountable and responsive to the needs of locals. They’re also just hugely popular across the partisan spectrum; routinely winning awards for service.
Many such deployments (like UTOPIA) involve building open access fiber infrastructure that numerous competitors (private, public, or otherwise) come in and compete over. In many of these areas, locals have the option of more than a dozen different ISPs to choose from, all providing broadband at a lower rate than what you’re used to from Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, or Charter.
That’s not to suggest community-owned broadband networks are some mystical panacea; they require smart leadership, strategic planning, and intelligent financing. But if done well, they not only drive significant fiber improvements directly to local markets, they incentivize lumbering regional private sector monopolies — long pampered by federal government corruption and muted competition — to actually try.
Widespread frustration with substandard U.S. broadband drove a big boost in such networks during COVID lockdowns. Since January 1, 2021, more than 47 new networks have come online, with dozens in the planning or pre-construction phases. Many are seeing a big financial boost thanks to 2021 COVID relief (ARPA) and infrastructure bill (IIJA) legislation funding (the latter of which hasn’t even arrived yet).
In response to this popular grass roots movement, giant ISPs have worked tirelessly to outlaw such efforts, regardless of voter intent. 16 states still have protectionist state laws, usually ghost written by giant telecom monopolies, prohibiting the construction or expansion of community broadband. House Republicans went so far as to try and ban all community broadband during a pandemic.
Lumbering regional monopolies like Comcast, AT&T, and Charter could have responded to this movement by lowering prices and improving service. Instead in many cases they found it cheaper to lobby politicians, sue fledgling networks, or create fake “consumer groups” tasked with spreading lies about the perils of community-owned broadband networks among local communities.
But based on the growth rate of such networks, these efforts have backfired, and locally-owned and operated broadband networks appear to be more popular than ever.
Filed Under: arpa, bead, broadband, community broadband, fiber, high speed internet, iiji, municipal, open access, telecom
Comments on “New Map Shows Community Broadband Networks Are Exploding In U.S.”
That’s rather worrying. I knew electrical networks in California were causing wildfires, but exploding community broadband networks is another level.
I’ll be here all day.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Niggers and transvestites (ie, Democrats) ruin everything.
Re:
🥱
Dear Congress, this is what an actual free market looks like. No thumbs on the scale to protect your corporate sponsors. No laws to make sure they never have to compete. No laws protecting their shitty abusive business model.
People in Africa have better, cheaper, faster access than we have in ‘Merika… and its because you are beholden to corporate donations & think you can keep conning citizens to vote for you with your dog whistles to motivate them to keep you in office doing your damnedest to harm them while increasing your net worth ridiculously.
And now we know why community broadband is so dangerous. How many people have been injured by exploding community broadband? What’s next, exploding pagers?
According to that map, if I want the best broadband rather than being a victim of regulatory capture, New Mexico is one state I for sure shouldn’t live in. Moving now.
Re:
Not to correct you here, but the map only shows community broadband networks. Technically, the lack of those could also be explained by good competition or lower prices. Not that I think that’s the case, but it’s important to avoid survivorship bias.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias
Re: Re:
You are technically correct, the best kind of correct. But I think that, at this point, if good ISPs were statistically significant, we’d have heard about them. Sonic is perhaps the only reasonably large one that people seem to like.
The FCC, of course, did actually try to map broadband in general. Infamously, it was hampered by bad data, mostly coming from the big service providers. By contrast, when a government regulates this stuff well, people stop caring about maps. They just move into their homes and expect the ability to order good internet service, just as they expect electricity.
This of course will not stop Big Telecom from stepping up its efforts to destroy all of these community networks, because it is literally leaving money on the table if it does nothing in response to them.
Nickel and Diming is also way lower.
I use one of these community owned fiber systems. When I signed up, they said that my internet rate would be $48 a month for gigabit Internet. My actual bill, is $48 a month. And it has been more very long time. Although, they did. Just notify me that connectivity prices are going up. By $2. So they’re going to advertise $50 a month. It’s great. Price transparency.
Oh, and unlike cable companies and historical telecoms, I actually generally get what is advertised. My upload and download speeds are generally around 970 megabits per second. My ping time to speedtest.net is 1 millisecond.
I am very satisfied with my care.
“Data routinely notes that community-owned broadband networks provide faster, cheaper, better service than their larger private-sector counterparts.”
LOL. I looked at pricing for the UTOPIA network and it’s ridiculously high. The cheapest offer for a 10 GPbs connection is 110 + 30 = $ 149/month.
In Italy you can get a 10 Gbps contract for 35 €/month.
https://www.tim.it/fisso-e-mobile/fibra-e-adsl/verifica-copertura
The US is a failed country.