Same type of issue as in commit
53d4f5fef and earlier fixes; also
found by apparently-more-picky-than-the-buildfarm valgrind testing.
This one is an oversight in commit
986816750. Since that's new in
HEAD, no need for a back-.
return;
/* it must be a valid replication slot index */
- Assert(idx >= 0 && idx < max_replication_slots);
+ Assert(idx < nReplSlotStats);
if (msg->m_drop)
{
/* Remove the replication slot statistics with the given name */
- memcpy(&replSlotStats[idx], &replSlotStats[nReplSlotStats - 1],
- sizeof(PgStat_ReplSlotStats));
+ if (idx < nReplSlotStats - 1)
+ memcpy(&replSlotStats[idx], &replSlotStats[nReplSlotStats - 1],
+ sizeof(PgStat_ReplSlotStats));
nReplSlotStats--;
- Assert(nReplSlotStats >= 0);
}
else
{